Partial knee replacement

Partial knee replacement is a surgical procedure aimed at replacing only the damaged compartment of the knee rather than the entire joint. It offers a less invasive alternative to total knee replacement for patients with localized osteoarthritis or compartmental damage. Understanding its indications, surgical approach, and outcomes is essential for optimizing patient care and functional recovery.

Introduction

Definition of Partial Knee Replacement

Partial knee replacement, also known as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, involves the selective replacement of one compartment of the knee joint, typically the medial, lateral, or patellofemoral compartment. This procedure preserves the healthy cartilage and ligaments in the unaffected compartments, allowing for more natural knee mechanics and potentially faster recovery compared to total knee replacement.

Historical Background and Evolution

The concept of partial knee replacement was first developed in the 1970s to provide a less invasive solution for patients with isolated compartmental arthritis. Early designs were limited by implant materials and fixation techniques, but advances in metallurgy, polyethylene inserts, and surgical instrumentation have improved durability and functional outcomes. Over the decades, minimally invasive techniques and computer-assisted navigation have further refined the procedure.

Clinical Importance and Indications

Partial knee replacement is particularly important for patients with localized knee osteoarthritis, as it targets the affected compartment while preserving healthy tissue. It is associated with faster rehabilitation, less postoperative pain, and greater preservation of natural knee kinematics. Appropriate patient selection is critical to achieving optimal outcomes and ensuring long-term implant survival.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Knee

Knee Joint Compartments

The knee joint is composed of three main compartments, each susceptible to degenerative changes that may necessitate partial replacement.

• Medial Compartment: The inner portion of the knee, commonly affected in osteoarthritis, bears the majority of body weight during standing and walking.
• Lateral Compartment: The outer portion of the knee, less commonly affected, supports lateral load transmission and balance during movement.
• Patellofemoral Compartment: The articulation between the patella and femur, often involved in anterior knee pain and cartilage degeneration.

Ligaments and Supporting Structures

The stability of the knee is maintained by the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, medial and lateral collateral ligaments, and surrounding muscles. Preservation of these structures during partial knee replacement allows for more natural knee motion and better proprioception compared to total knee replacement.

Normal Biomechanics and Load Distribution

Understanding knee biomechanics is essential for successful partial knee replacement. The medial compartment typically bears 60–70% of the load during normal gait, while the lateral compartment and patellofemoral joint share the remaining forces. Proper implant alignment and placement are critical to restoring normal load distribution, preventing excessive wear, and ensuring long-term joint function.

Indications and Patient Selection

Osteoarthritis and Compartmental Damage

Partial knee replacement is primarily indicated for patients with isolated osteoarthritis affecting a single compartment of the knee. The procedure is most effective when the remaining compartments have preserved cartilage and normal joint alignment. Radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing and osteophyte formation in one compartment often guides the decision for surgery.

Other Degenerative Conditions

In addition to osteoarthritis, partial knee replacement may be considered in patients with post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis localized to a single compartment, or secondary degenerative changes following meniscal injury. Careful assessment ensures that the affected compartment is suitable for replacement and that the procedure will provide meaningful functional improvement.

Patient Criteria

• Age and Activity Level: Ideal candidates are often younger, active patients who wish to maintain a high level of function while minimizing bone removal.
• Body Mass Index: Excessive weight may increase implant wear and complicate surgical outcomes; patients with moderate BMI are preferred candidates.
• Bone Quality and Alignment: Adequate bone stock and proper limb alignment are essential for implant stability and long-term success.

Contraindications

Partial knee replacement is not recommended for patients with inflammatory arthritis affecting multiple compartments, significant ligamentous instability, or severe malalignment. Advanced obesity, active infection, or poor bone quality may also preclude surgery. Accurate patient selection is critical to achieving favorable outcomes and minimizing complications.

Preoperative Assessment

Clinical Examination

Preoperative evaluation includes a thorough clinical examination to assess pain location, range of motion, ligament stability, and deformities. Functional assessment of gait, muscle strength, and daily activity limitations helps determine suitability for partial knee replacement and guides surgical planning.

Imaging Studies

• X-rays: Standard weight-bearing radiographs evaluate joint space narrowing, osteophyte formation, and overall limb alignment.
• MRI: Provides detailed assessment of cartilage, menisci, ligaments, and subchondral bone, particularly useful when compartmental involvement is uncertain.
• CT Scan: Offers precise measurement of bone morphology and alignment, aiding in preoperative templating and implant positioning.

Preoperative Planning and Patient Counseling

Planning involves selecting the appropriate implant size, determining surgical approach, and anticipating intraoperative challenges. Patients are counseled on expected outcomes, rehabilitation protocols, potential complications, and the advantages and limitations of partial versus total knee replacement. Thorough preoperative preparation ensures realistic expectations and optimal postoperative recovery.

Surgical Techniques

Medial vs. Lateral Compartment Replacement

Partial knee replacement can target either the medial or lateral compartment depending on the location of degenerative changes. Medial compartment replacement is more common due to higher incidence of medial osteoarthritis, while lateral compartment replacement is less frequent and requires careful attention to knee alignment and ligament balance. Accurate identification of the affected compartment is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes and prevent progression of arthritis in the remaining compartments.

Unicondylar Knee Replacement

Unicondylar knee replacement involves resurfacing only the damaged femoral condyle and corresponding tibial plateau. This technique preserves healthy cartilage, cruciate ligaments, and bone stock. The procedure typically involves small incisions, minimal soft tissue disruption, and precise alignment to restore natural knee kinematics while minimizing postoperative pain and recovery time.

Instrumentation and Alignment Guides

Modern surgical techniques use specialized instruments and alignment guides to ensure accurate implant placement. These tools help achieve proper tibial and femoral cuts, maintain limb alignment, and optimize joint mechanics. Computer-assisted navigation and patient-specific instrumentation further enhance precision, reducing the risk of malalignment and improving long-term implant survival.

Minimally Invasive vs. Conventional Approaches

Minimally invasive approaches for partial knee replacement involve smaller incisions and reduced soft tissue disruption compared to conventional surgery. Benefits include decreased postoperative pain, faster rehabilitation, and improved early functional outcomes. However, minimally invasive techniques require advanced surgical expertise and careful patient selection to avoid complications.

Implant Types and Materials

Metal Components

Metallic components in partial knee replacement are typically made from cobalt-chromium or titanium alloys. These components replace the damaged femoral condyle or tibial plateau, providing durability and smooth articulation with the polyethylene insert. The choice of metal depends on patient-specific factors such as bone quality, allergy history, and anticipated load demands.

Polyethylene Inserts

Polyethylene inserts serve as the articulating surface between the metal femoral and tibial components. High-density, cross-linked polyethylene is commonly used to reduce wear and enhance longevity. The insert thickness and shape are selected to restore joint space, maintain alignment, and ensure smooth motion throughout the range of knee movement.

Fixation Methods

• Cemented: Polymethylmethacrylate cement is used to secure components to bone, providing immediate stability and reliable fixation.
• Cementless: Porous-coated implants allow bone ingrowth for biological fixation, potentially reducing long-term loosening and facilitating revision surgery if needed.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Pain Management

Effective pain control after partial knee replacement is essential for early mobilization and rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia, including oral medications, regional nerve blocks, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is commonly employed. Adequate pain management reduces postoperative discomfort, facilitates participation in physical therapy, and promotes faster functional recovery.

Physical Therapy Protocols

Rehabilitation focuses on restoring range of motion, strength, and functional mobility. Early weight-bearing exercises are encouraged to prevent muscle atrophy and improve joint stability. Physical therapy typically includes:

• Quadriceps and hamstring strengthening exercises
• Range-of-motion exercises to prevent stiffness
• Gait training and balance exercises
• Progressive functional activities tailored to patient goals

Return to Activities and Functional Recovery

Patients can often resume daily activities within a few weeks following partial knee replacement, depending on individual recovery and adherence to rehabilitation protocols. Low-impact activities, such as walking, swimming, and cycling, are usually permitted early, while high-impact sports may require longer recovery. Ongoing monitoring ensures proper joint function, alignment, and prevention of complications.

Complications and Risks

Infection and Wound Healing

Postoperative infection is a serious complication that can compromise implant survival. Prophylactic antibiotics, sterile surgical techniques, and careful wound care reduce infection risk. Delayed wound healing may occur in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes or peripheral vascular disease.

Implant Loosening or Malalignment

Improper placement or alignment of components can lead to implant loosening, abnormal wear, and reduced functional outcomes. Accurate surgical technique, preoperative planning, and use of alignment guides or robotic assistance minimize these risks. Malalignment may result in persistent pain, limited range of motion, and accelerated degeneration of the remaining compartments.

Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Patients undergoing partial knee replacement are at risk for venous thromboembolism. Prophylactic anticoagulation, early mobilization, and compression devices are used to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Monitoring for signs of swelling, pain, or shortness of breath is critical during the postoperative period.

Persistent Pain or Stiffness

Some patients may experience ongoing pain or reduced knee mobility despite successful surgery. Causes include improper implant selection, soft tissue imbalance, or incomplete rehabilitation. Early recognition and intervention through physical therapy, medication adjustments, or revision surgery may be necessary to optimize outcomes.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Short-term Functional Outcomes

Patients undergoing partial knee replacement typically experience significant improvements in pain relief, joint function, and mobility within weeks of surgery. Early outcomes include increased range of motion, enhanced ability to perform daily activities, and reduced reliance on analgesics. The less invasive nature of the procedure compared to total knee replacement often results in faster recovery and shorter hospital stays.

Long-term Implant Survival

Long-term studies indicate that partial knee replacements have favorable implant survival rates, particularly when patient selection and surgical technique are appropriate. Survival rates at 10 to 15 years are generally high, though they may be lower than those for total knee replacement in certain populations. Proper alignment, patient compliance with rehabilitation, and avoidance of high-impact activities contribute to prolonged implant longevity.

Quality of Life Improvements

Partial knee replacement significantly enhances quality of life by reducing chronic pain, improving physical function, and enabling participation in recreational and occupational activities. Patients often report higher satisfaction due to preservation of native knee kinematics, natural sensation during movement, and faster return to preoperative activity levels.

Comparison with Total Knee Replacement

Advantages of Partial Knee Replacement

Partial knee replacement offers several advantages over total knee replacement, including:

• Preservation of healthy cartilage and ligaments
• Less invasive surgery with smaller incisions
• Reduced blood loss and postoperative pain
• Faster rehabilitation and return to daily activities
• Improved natural knee kinematics and proprioception

Limitations and Considerations

Despite its benefits, partial knee replacement has limitations. It is suitable only for patients with isolated compartmental disease and requires careful alignment and precise surgical technique. Disease progression in other compartments may necessitate future conversion to total knee replacement. Long-term outcomes are highly dependent on patient selection, surgical skill, and adherence to rehabilitation protocols.

Patient Selection Differences

Patient selection for partial versus total knee replacement differs primarily based on disease extent, joint alignment, and ligament integrity. Patients with multicompartmental osteoarthritis, significant deformity, or ligament insufficiency are better candidates for total knee replacement. Conversely, those with localized degeneration, intact ligaments, and good bone quality are ideal for partial knee replacement, maximizing functional outcomes and implant longevity.

Emerging Techniques and Future Directions

Robotic-Assisted Partial Knee Replacement

Robotic-assisted partial knee replacement has emerged as an advanced surgical technique that enhances precision in implant placement and alignment. The robotic system provides real-time feedback, enabling the surgeon to achieve optimal bone cuts and component positioning. This technology has been shown to improve early functional outcomes, reduce variability, and potentially extend implant longevity.

Patient-Specific Instrumentation

Patient-specific instrumentation involves creating customized surgical guides based on preoperative imaging, such as CT or MRI scans. These guides allow for precise alignment and sizing of the implant, minimizing intraoperative adjustments and improving accuracy. Patient-specific approaches may reduce operative time, decrease soft tissue disruption, and enhance postoperative recovery.

Advancements in Implant Materials and Design

Recent innovations in implant materials, such as highly cross-linked polyethylene, advanced metal alloys, and coatings that promote bone integration, aim to increase durability and reduce wear. Design improvements, including modular and mobile-bearing components, enhance kinematics, mimic natural knee motion, and accommodate patient-specific anatomy, further improving functional outcomes.

References

1. Berend KR, Lombardi AV. Partial knee replacement: current concepts and outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(4):321–329.
2. Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(1):145–150.
3. Lonner JH, et al. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: techniques and outcomes. Orthopedics. 2008;31(9 Suppl 1):37–42.
4. Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: indications and long-term results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(10):596–603.
5. Bell SW, et al. Robotic-assisted partial knee arthroplasty: accuracy and early outcomes. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(6):742–749.
6. Hutt JR, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in partial knee replacement: review and recommendations. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(6):981–987.
7. Berend ME, et al. Implant material innovations in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(1):70–78.
8. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: design and function. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68-B(1):65–71.
9. Fisher DA, et al. Functional outcomes after partial versus total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):44–52.
10. Kim RH, et al. Long-term survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6):967–972.