Incomplete dominance

Incomplete dominance is a genetic phenomenon where the heterozygous genotype produces a phenotype that is intermediate between the two homozygous phenotypes. It represents an important variation from classic Mendelian inheritance and has implications in understanding trait expression. This concept is observed across plants, animals, and humans.

Definition and Concept

Definition of Incomplete Dominance

Incomplete dominance occurs when neither allele is completely dominant over the other, resulting in a blended or intermediate phenotype in heterozygotes. Unlike complete dominance, both alleles contribute to the observable trait, but the dominant allele does not fully mask the recessive allele.

Historical Background and Discovery

The concept of incomplete dominance was first observed in the early 20th century by geneticists studying flower color in plants. Researchers noted that crossing red and white snapdragons produced pink offspring, which could not be explained by Mendel’s principle of complete dominance alone.

Key Principles in Genetics

• Heterozygous individuals express an intermediate phenotype.
• Both alleles influence the trait to some extent, but neither is completely dominant.
• Phenotypic ratios in offspring differ from those predicted by complete dominance.

Mechanism of Inheritance

Allelic Interactions and Expression

In incomplete dominance, the alleles at a single gene locus interact such that the heterozygous genotype produces a phenotype that is a mixture of the effects of both alleles. This occurs because neither allele is able to completely dominate the expression of the other.

Homozygous and Heterozygous Genotypes

• Homozygous Dominant (AA): Exhibits the full expression of the dominant trait.
• Homozygous Recessive (aa): Exhibits the full expression of the recessive trait.
• Heterozygous (Aa): Exhibits an intermediate phenotype between the dominant and recessive forms.

Phenotypic Outcomes

The resulting phenotype in heterozygotes is typically intermediate in appearance or intensity compared to the two homozygous forms. This results in distinct ratios of observable traits in the offspring when heterozygotes are crossed.

Examples in Humans

Hair Texture Variations

In some populations, the heterozygous combination of alleles for hair texture can result in wavy hair, which is intermediate between straight and curly hair observed in homozygotes.

Skin Pigmentation Patterns

Skin color can show incomplete dominance when alleles from parents of differing pigmentation combine, producing intermediate shades in offspring.

Other Clinically Relevant Traits

• Certain eye color variations in heterozygous individuals.
• Variation in blood enzyme levels where intermediate expression occurs.

Examples in Plants and Animals

Flower Color in Snapdragons

One of the classic examples of incomplete dominance is seen in snapdragons. Crossing red-flowered plants (RR) with white-flowered plants (rr) produces pink-flowered offspring (Rr), demonstrating an intermediate phenotype.

Coat Color in Animals

In certain animals, such as rabbits and horses, heterozygous combinations of coat color alleles produce intermediate shades rather than the colors seen in homozygotes. For example, a cross between black and white rabbits may produce gray offspring.

Fruit Color Variations

Incomplete dominance is also observed in plants like carnations and certain fruits, where heterozygous genotypes yield colors or patterns that are intermediate between parental forms.

Genetic Ratios and Punnett Squares

Monohybrid Crosses Illustrating Incomplete Dominance

Monohybrid crosses involving incomplete dominance demonstrate predictable ratios of phenotypes based on the combination of alleles from the parents. These crosses differ from those in complete dominance because the heterozygous phenotype is distinct.

Phenotypic and Genotypic Ratios

For a monohybrid cross between two heterozygotes (Rr x Rr), the genotypic ratio is:

• 1 RR : 2 Rr : 1 rr

The corresponding phenotypic ratio is:

• 1 Red : 2 Pink : 1 White

Interpretation of Punnett Squares

Punnett squares are used to predict the probability of offspring phenotypes and genotypes. In incomplete dominance, the squares clearly show the intermediate phenotype in heterozygotes, which helps in understanding inheritance patterns and predicting trait distribution.

Molecular Basis

Gene Expression and Protein Activity

Incomplete dominance occurs at the molecular level when the gene product of one allele is not sufficient to produce the full phenotype associated with that allele. The heterozygous genotype results in an intermediate level of protein or enzyme activity, leading to a blended phenotype.

Role of Dominant and Recessive Alleles in Phenotype

Neither allele is completely dominant; both contribute to the final phenotype. The dominant allele may partially express its trait while the recessive allele also influences the outcome, creating the intermediate appearance.

Biochemical Pathways Affected

The intermediate phenotype often arises from partial enzyme activity, pigment production, or structural protein formation. For example, pigment synthesis in flowers may be reduced in heterozygotes, resulting in a lighter color than the homozygous dominant parent.

Clinical and Biological Significance

Implications in Genetic Counseling

Understanding incomplete dominance is important for predicting trait inheritance and counseling families regarding the likelihood of offspring expressing intermediate phenotypes, particularly for medically relevant traits.

Impact on Population Genetics

Incomplete dominance contributes to genetic diversity within populations by maintaining intermediate traits. It affects allele frequencies and can influence evolutionary processes by creating phenotypic variation that may be subject to natural selection.

Relevance in Breeding and Agriculture

Breeders utilize incomplete dominance to develop plants and animals with desired intermediate traits, such as flower color, fruit size, or coat patterns. Knowledge of inheritance patterns helps in planning crosses to achieve predictable outcomes.

Comparison with Other Forms of Inheritance

Complete Dominance vs Incomplete Dominance

Codominance vs Incomplete Dominance

In codominance, both alleles are fully expressed in the heterozygote, resulting in a phenotype showing both traits simultaneously, rather than a blended intermediate. An example is the AB blood group in humans. In contrast, incomplete dominance produces a single intermediate phenotype.

Multiple Alleles and Their Effects

Multiple alleles can interact in ways that exhibit incomplete dominance, especially when more than two allelic forms exist for a gene. The resulting phenotypes may show varying degrees of expression depending on the combination of alleles present in the heterozygote.

Experimental Studies and Observations

Key Experiments Demonstrating Incomplete Dominance

Early geneticists used controlled plant crosses to illustrate incomplete dominance. Snapdragons and four o’clock plants were studied extensively to show how intermediate flower colors arose in heterozygous offspring, providing clear experimental evidence.

Modern Genetic Research Findings

Advances in molecular genetics have confirmed the biochemical basis of incomplete dominance, showing how gene dosage and protein activity levels contribute to intermediate phenotypes. Modern studies also explore the role of incomplete dominance in complex traits and polygenic inheritance.

Model Organisms Used in Studies

• Plants such as snapdragons, carnations, and four o’clock plants
• Animals including rabbits and poultry for coat or feather color studies
• Yeast and bacterial models for studying gene expression and enzyme activity in heterozygotes

References

1. Griffiths AJF, Wessler SR, Carroll SB, Doebley J. Introduction to Genetic Analysis. 12th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman; 2015.
2. Hartl DL, Jones EW. Genetics: Analysis of Genes and Genomes. 9th ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2018.
3. Russell PJ. Genetics. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2018.
4. Klug WS, Cummings MR, Spencer CA, Palladino MA. Concepts of Genetics. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2019.
5. King RC, Stansfield WD, Mulligan PK. A Dictionary of Genetics. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
6. Weiss KM, Buchanan AV. Principles of Genetics. Boston: McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
7. Allard RW. Principles of Plant Breeding. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
8. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 1996.
9. Moore JH, Williams SM. Epistasis and the genetics of complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(4):249-258.